[Bug 6836] New: Confusing Windows About Boxes

Wine Bugs wine-bugs at winehq.org
Wed Dec 6 03:18:41 CST 2006


http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6836

           Summary: Confusing Windows About Boxes
           Product: Wine
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: other
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: wine-binary
        AssignedTo: wine-bugs at winehq.org
        ReportedBy: matthew.flaschen at gatech.edu


I realized (in the course of researching Bug 6834), that Wine shows its
contributors in the about of certain programs that comes with Windows, such as 
Pinball, the original notepad, pinball, minesweeper, etc.  All of these programs
(and all the Windows operating system programs I tested) show a Wine credit
(scroll bar with Wine contributors) in the about box; this may also be true of
other programs using the same about box type.  I will attach the about boxes 
from these three programs on Windows and Wine.  In at least one case (original
Notepad), there is no indication of the original copyright/authorship at all,
and a careless read makes it seem like Wine wrote it!  For Minesweeper, the
authorship is included, but there is no copyright statement.  For Pinball,
there's a cutoff statement "3D Pinball Table created for Microsoft by [...]" (if
you can't wait to see the attachments, it's Maxis).  I really don't know for
certain how this came about (and am not prepared to read the source right now),
but I'll speculate.  There's probably an API call that generates about screens.
 It seems the Wine version always shows the line after the copyright statement
from the original (at least until it gets cutoff); this could be a parameter for
the function.  Regardless, I don't think this is fair.  The Microsoft copyright
statement should be generated in good faith.  The original about boxes contain
the full name of the program, the version, a generic Copyright (C) 1981-2001 (at
least on those I tested) Microsoft Corporation.  Then, some have more detailed
authorship on the next line, such as "by Robert Donner and Curt Johnson".  This
is the only part that Wine interprets.  After that, the Windows versions go on
to say "This product is licensed under ... to <NAME>", and for no apparent
reason the physical memory available.  I'm guessing that this info is passed to
an API call, but if not mostly equivalent info is present in the resource file
(under Version-1) and could be manually parsed.

In short, I think Wine should attempt to reproduce this info and should not take
advantage of the API for free advertising.  I definitely appreciate the very
hard work of the wine developers, but I think the project is out of line here. 
At the very least, the original authorship and copyright should be displayed
(ensuring that nothing's cut off).  However, I don't think the contributors
should be shown here.  It makes it appear to the naive user that they helped
write the program; in fact, they wrote a translation layer the program is
currently (but was not designed to be) using (some of these people didn't even
write any calls the program uses). 

There may be legal ramifications to this, if wine is viewed as creating a
derivative work (doubtful); strict good-faith translation would be fair use, but
this might not be.  Either way, I don't think it's right.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.



More information about the wine-bugs mailing list