[Bug 11537] Sid Meier's Pirates! install fails with 1603 ( failing to request disk 2)

[wine-bugs at winehq.org]

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11537





--- Comment #13 from Stephen E. Baker <cycoone at hotmail.com>  2008-02-13 14:46:43 ---
Ok, the significant portion of my regression results

wine-0.9.49 *good
wine-0.9.49-159-ga97d655 *good
wine-0.9.49-160-gbb747e4 (*1) + 162patch (*1) + 216patch (*2) + 264patch
(*bad2)
wine-0.9.49-161-gbb747e4 (*1) + 216patch (*3) untestable
wine-0.9.49-162-gb1507ae (*1) + 216patch (*2) + 264patch (*bad2)
wine-0.9.49-216-g78eead9 (*4) + 264patch (*bad)
wine-0.9.49-217-g3c8663b (*4) + 264patch (*bad)
wine-0.9.49-264-g075e84b *bad
wine-0.9.50 *bad

*1 - 1607: Unable to install InstallShield Scripting Runtime regression
*2 - 1627: ERROR_FUNCTION_FAILED
*3 - Patch fails
*4 - 1603 error when starting to copy files
*bad - suffers 'not prompting for second disk regression' with 1603 error
*bad2 - same as bad, but error message is 1627: ERROR_FUNCTION FAILED
*good - no regression

So as you can see, wine-0.9.49-160 patched with 162, 216, and 264 is the first
version to exhibit the bug.  I haven't traced down where the slight differences
in the error message came from, but it's likely the result of a minor change in
dlls/msi/files.c unrelated to my bug.  Hopefully with this information you will
be able to find how it use to detect that the second disk was needed and why it
isn't now.

Note: Prior to the regression the switch disks dialog had an OK and Cancel
button, but clicking the Cnacel button would just reprompt you.  Perhaps this
could be fixed at the same time.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.