[Bug 15206] Trouble with symbolic stack dumps and Chromium

[wine-bugs at winehq.org]

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15206


Eric Pouech <eric.pouech at orange.fr> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |eric.pouech at orange.fr
                URL|                            |http://build.chromium.org/bu
                   |http://build.chromium.org/bu|ildbot/snapshots/chromium-
                   |ildbot/snapshots/chromium-  |rel-xp/
                   |rel-xp/                     |




--- Comment #1 from Eric Pouech <eric.pouech at orange.fr>  2008-09-09 15:06:25 ---
currently winedbg still forces a pdb file to have correct timestamp (or guid)
and age

timestamp (or guid) is generated the first time the pdb file is created
the age starts at 1 and gets incremented at each recompilation of the project
(without erasing the .pdb file)

so for consistency reasons, it's still usefull to force timestamp & age mapping
between module and .pdb file

the good news is that now dbghelp knows how to load .pdb files which don't
fully match.

the attached patch let winedbg turn on this feature (it's off by default)
set ! module +
is the command to be used in winedbg
(I'm still unhappy with this patch, so still looking for a better solution)

you can very easily check that they match (tried the build 1712 and they match)
do $WINE/tools/winedump/winedump -j debug chrome-win32/chrome.exe
and $WINE/tools/winedump/winedump chrome_exe.pdb
Age is the same (30 in my case, ditto for .dll). maybe there are older .pdb is
the path ? (IIRC we do a depth first search first, so if you have other .pdb
files in your pdb-bug directory, including in sub-sub-sub directories), you may
get the error. however the algo should only return the matching file if any
(patches committed yesterday)

for the rest, if I remove the flow of unsupported types (102c, 1137, 1139), I
get err:ntdll:RtlpWaitForCriticalSection section 0x7d9679b4 "?" wait timed out
in thread 0009, blocked by 0000, retrying (60 sec)
error, which needs further investigations

will look further next days
A+


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.