[Bug 9787] Warcraft3 Battle.net Doesn't work (Needs AcceptEx)

wine-bugs at winehq.org wine-bugs at winehq.org
Mon Jun 15 22:42:25 CDT 2009


http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9787


Michał Kozal <panaut0lordv at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |panaut0lordv at gmail.com

DanielSjoholm <steelside at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Attachment #20299|Hopefully updated for       |Hopefully updated for
        description|1.1.18                      |1.1.18
                   |                            |Typo, won't build.
  Attachment #20299|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |

UncleOwen <anakin.skyw at gmx.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |anakin.skyw at gmx.de

Vitaliy Margolen <vitaliy at kievinfo.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |hardkaare at gmail.com

Daniel Rhodes-Mumby <daniel.rhodes.mumby at googlemail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |daniel.rhodes.mumby at googlem
                   |                            |ail.com

Christoph Haag <therealchris at hotmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |therealchris at hotmail.com

Austin English <austinenglish at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|austinenglish at gmail.com     |

Rob Wilson <cinzento007 at yahoo.com.br> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |cinzento007 at yahoo.com.br

Matej Spindler <matej.spindler at auspuh.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |matej.spindler at auspuh.com

Rob Wilson <cinzento007 at yahoo.com.br> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Attachment #20615|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |

Austin English <austinenglish at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |whellmundv at gmail.com

Nephyrin zey <Nephyrin at nephyrin.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |Nephyrin at nephyrin.net

Stev47 <stephan at ehilb.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |stephan at ehilb.de

Rob Wilson <cinzento007 at yahoo.com.br> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Attachment #20616|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |
  Attachment #20617|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |

Matt Callaghan <fermulator at sympatico.ca> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |fermulator at sympatico.ca




--- Comment #350 from Nicky <nheart at gmail.com>  2009-03-28 07:40:01 ---
Could I request an AcceptEx patch that correctly applies to 1.1.18?

--- Comment #351 from Michał Kozal <panaut0lordv at gmail.com>  2009-03-29 14:24:48 ---
(In reply to comment #350)
> Could I request an AcceptEx patch that correctly applies to 1.1.18?
> 

1.1.12 patch applies just fine, you've to use also
http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=20103 for wc3 1.23

--- Comment #352 from DanielSjoholm <steelside at gmail.com>  2009-04-05 07:45:12 ---
(In reply to comment #351)
> (In reply to comment #350)
> > Could I request an AcceptEx patch that correctly applies to 1.1.18?
> > 
> 
> 1.1.12 patch applies just fine, you've to use also
> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=20103 for wc3 1.23
> 

It doesn't work for me (acceptex patch) for 1.1.18... this is with fuzz=0 thou
(haven't tried without it), but needs a fix to work moar smooth. (Worked
flawless for .15 with the exact same setup)

1 out of 6 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file server/async.c.rej
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file server/file.h.rej

--- Comment #353 from DanielSjoholm <steelside at gmail.com>  2009-04-05 08:18:38 ---
Created an attachment (id=20299)
 --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=20299)
Hopefully updated for 1.1.18

This is the 1.1.12 patch modified to work for 1.1.18.
It went through here, so I hope it's good.

--- Comment #354 from DanielSjoholm <steelside at gmail.com>  2009-04-05 08:53:46 ---
(From update of attachment 20299)
Oops i rushed posting it here, this patch has a typo in it. This time I'll
compile it first, so uploading a new one in a moment.

--- Comment #355 from DanielSjoholm <steelside at gmail.com>  2009-04-05 10:24:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=20300)
 --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=20300)
Working patch for 1.1.18

Sorry about the mailspam.. 

Anyway, this one got no hunks rejected, compiles fine, hosting worked.
Same procedure as for the 1.1.12 patch is required for compiling.

Also remember to patch with the secur32 thing ^, as else the 1.23 patch will
have wc3 crashing in under a minute in any chat channel.

--- Comment #356 from Vitaliy Margolen <vitaliy at kievinfo.com>  2009-04-07 09:05:11 ---
*** Bug 17951 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

--- Comment #357 from Christoph Haag <therealchris at hotmail.com>  2009-04-09 04:24:43 ---
Created an attachment (id=20349)
 --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=20349)
Buildlog: AcceptEx Patch does not work for wine 1.1.8

(In reply to comment #355)
> Created an attachment (id=20300)
 --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=20300) [details]
> Working patch for 1.1.18

> Anyway, this one got no hunks rejected, compiles fine, hosting worked.
> Same procedure as for the 1.1.12 patch is required for compiling.

The patch does not work here on Archlinux.

--- Comment #358 from Daniel Rhodes-Mumby <daniel.rhodes.mumby at googlemail.com>  2009-04-11 19:16:13 ---
(In reply to comment #357)
> Created an attachment (id=20349)
 --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=20349) [details]
> Buildlog: AcceptEx Patch does not work for wine 1.1.8
> 
> (In reply to comment #355)
> > Created an attachment (id=20300)
 --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=20300) [details] [details]
> > Working patch for 1.1.18
> 
> > Anyway, this one got no hunks rejected, compiles fine, hosting worked.
> > Same procedure as for the 1.1.12 patch is required for compiling.
> 
> The patch does not work here on Archlinux.
> 

By the looks of things you didn't run tools/make_request beforehand.
I had the same problem, read through the thread a bit and then ran the script
before calling make again. It compiled fine that time.

--- Comment #359 from Christoph Haag <therealchris at hotmail.com>  2009-04-12 06:48:03 ---
(In reply to comment #358)
> (In reply to comment #357)
> > Created an attachment (id=20349)
 --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=20349) [details] [details]
> > Buildlog: AcceptEx Patch does not work for wine 1.1.8
> > 
> > The patch does not work here on Archlinux.
> > 
> By the looks of things you didn't run tools/make_request beforehand.
> I had the same problem, read through the thread a bit and then ran the script
> before calling make again. It compiled fine that time.

Yes, the building procedure was:

> build() {
>   cd $srcdir/$pkgname-$pkgver
> patch -p1 < $startdir/acceptex-1.1.18.patch
>   ./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc --with-x
>   make depend || return 1
>   make || return 1
>   make prefix=$pkgdir/usr install || return 1
>   mkdir -p $pkgdir/etc/wine
> }

After adding
> tools/make_requests
(the file is called make_requests with s at the end) after the configure and
> patch -p1 < $startdir/0001-secur32-Disable-schannel-InitializeSecurityContextW.patch
before (sec32 bug), it seems to compile fine. Strange, in the last wine version
it compiled with the patch without seperately running make_requests.

--- Comment #360 from Rob Wilson <cinzento007 at yahoo.com.br>  2009-04-15 17:14:43 ---
Could anyone make a step-by-step tutorial to install this AccpetEx patch?
I couldn't even found it to download, and I would be really glad if you could
help me here.
Thanks.

--- Comment #361 from Lukáš Krejza <gryffus at hkfree.org>  2009-04-19 06:03:48 ---
(In reply to comment #326)
> Ok so lets hope he will find some time for this... Thanx for the info...
> 
>         Gfs
> 

Does anyone already know the Alexandre's opinion? What exactly is a problem
with this patch that it cannot be inculded?
If there is no other way to implement this - it means that it will not be
implemented??

--- Comment #362 from Rob Wilson <cinzento007 at yahoo.com.br>  2009-04-22 17:30:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=20615)
 --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=20615)
Error compiling AcceptEx patched 1.1.18 version

--- Comment #363 from Rob Wilson <cinzento007 at yahoo.com.br>  2009-04-22 17:32:45 ---
Created an attachment (id=20616)
 --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=20616)
Error compiling AcceptEx patched 1.1.18 version

--- Comment #364 from Rob Wilson <cinzento007 at yahoo.com.br>  2009-04-22 17:32:55 ---
Created an attachment (id=20617)
 --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=20617)
Error compiling AcceptEx patched 1.1.18 version

--- Comment #365 from Rob Wilson <cinzento007 at yahoo.com.br>  2009-04-23 18:06:17 ---
I've applied the patchs (acceptex-1.1.18.patch and
0001-secur32-Disable-schannel-InitializeSecurityContextW.patch), compiled and
installed wine 1.1.18. Now chat and hosting works perfectly (they didn't with
no-patched version). But I still can't play Bnet games. Once the map finishes
loading and the game screen appear, the "You have been disconnected." message
appears.

Does anyone have any idea about wich problem can it be? How can I fix this?

--- Comment #366 from Rob Wilson <cinzento007 at yahoo.com.br>  2009-04-23 18:11:33 ---
I've applied the patchs (acceptex-1.1.18.patch and
0001-secur32-Disable-schannel-InitializeSecurityContextW.patch), compiled and
installed wine 1.1.18. Now chat and hosting works perfectly (they didn't with
no-patched version). But I still can't play Bnet games. Once the map finishes
loading and the game screen appear, the "You have been disconnected." message
appears.

Does anyone have any idea about wich problem can it be? How can I fix this?(In
reply to comment #365)
> I've applied the patchs (acceptex-1.1.18.patch and
> 0001-secur32-Disable-schannel-InitializeSecurityContextW.patch), compiled and
> installed wine 1.1.18. Now chat and hosting works perfectly (they didn't with
> no-patched version). But I still can't play Bnet games. Once the map finishes
> loading and the game screen appear, the "You have been disconnected." message
> appears.
> 
> Does anyone have any idea about wich problem can it be? How can I fix this?
> 

I've forgot to say: custom game works perfectly. I'm having problems just with
ladder games.

--- Comment #367 from Rob Wilson <cinzento007 at yahoo.com.br>  2009-04-23 18:32:58 ---
I've solved my problem. It was just some ip ports that I had to open.

--- Comment #368 from Vitaliy Margolen <vitaliy at kievinfo.com>  2009-04-23 20:19:14 ---
(In reply to comment #367)
Rob Wilson <cinzento007 at yahoo.com.br>

Would you stop spamming bugzilla! Use forums to ask user questions. You posted
dozen comments that do not add any additional information to the bug.
If you need help with using your system (which includes compiler) consult
manual for it.

--- Comment #369 from Austin English <austinenglish at gmail.com>  2009-04-26 20:55:05 ---
*** Bug 15794 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

--- Comment #370 from Nephyrin zey <Nephyrin at nephyrin.net>  2009-06-03 05:34:42 ---
So, looking to play Warcraft III in wine, i booted it up to immediately
encounter massive battle.net issues. After looking up these bugs, i did the
following:

- Recompiled wine (1.1.22) with gnutls
- applied "Disable schannel InitializeSecurityContextW" from bug 17809
- applied the most recent acceptex 1.1.18 patch from this bug (9787) (it does
work on .22, just need to rerun make_requests)

After doing this, warcraft III works flawlessly. I started battle.net and
played and hosted several games with no issue. I did get a 'disconnected' error
immediately after signing in the first time, but was unable to reproduce on
subsequent logins. Warcraft III would be nearly platinum status if these
patches (or more appropriate fixes) were mainline.
The only issue i encountered, other than the one disconnect, was that
de-focusing the window and refocusing causes white textures. Emulate virtual
desktop works around this.
Oh and in OpenGL mode, solid 60FPS.

--- Comment #371 from Matt Callaghan <fermulator at sympatico.ca>  2009-06-15 22:27:57 ---
I'm also very interested to know why this patch isn't included in the main wine
branch.  Forcing users to compile wine and apply the patch manually is a little
ridiculous.

What do we need to do in order to see this in future wine versions?

--- Comment #372 from Austin English <austinenglish at gmail.com>  2009-06-15 22:41:55 ---
(In reply to comment #371)
> I'm also very interested to know why this patch isn't included in the main wine
> branch.  Forcing users to compile wine and apply the patch manually is a little
> ridiculous.
> 
> What do we need to do in order to see this in future wine versions?

This has been answered multiple times in the comments. No need to add new
comments to ask why.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.


More information about the wine-bugs mailing list