[Bug 21515] VENDOR_WINE vs VENDOR_ATI with xf86-video-ati

[wine-bugs at winehq.org]

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21515





--- Comment #61 from Cùran <debian at carbon-project.org>  2010-02-10 14:55:33 ---
(In reply to comment #60)
No need for such stuff, as you might have seen from looking at
<http://dev.carbon-project.org/debian/wine-unstable/> I'm using a Debian build
process involving a clean chroot environment for every build. Therefore no old
files are present. Also an installation of the new packages automatically
replaces/removes all old versions. The patches get applied at build time,
something I can see by simply looking at the build logs. But you shouldn't
forget that:
a) I'm using a different GPU for these tests, 
b) what Stefan pointed out earlier, that this quirk might not work for the FOSS
driver, and
c) even though the r300 through r500 drivers share a lot of code, not every
part is the same. So this quirk might help you but not necessarily me.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.