[Bug 21515] VENDOR_WINE vs VENDOR_ATI with xf86-video-ati

[wine-bugs at winehq.org]

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21515





--- Comment #94 from Henri Verbeet <hverbeet at gmail.com>  2010-02-26 09:25:16 ---
(In reply to comment #92)
> I'm not sure this is a good idea, as Mesa and Gallium aren't the same drivers
> and may require different quirks in the future. But this is probably better
> answered by somebody with knowledge of the internals of Wine's D3D
> implementation and driver handling. In case your proposition is viable, I'm
> happy to try to work it into the current patch series (or add it on top of
> that).
> 
We can split classic Mesa and Gallium if needed, but the main use of this code
should be for reporting the right card and driver info back to the application.
We also have plenty of quirks that use this information, but there's a strong
preference to test actual behaviour for quirks instead of depending on the
detected card/driver.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.