[Bug 14717] resampled sound is horrible

wine-bugs at winehq.org wine-bugs at winehq.org
Sat Nov 27 06:19:27 CST 2010


http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14717

--- Comment #25 from Alexander E. Patrakov <patrakov at gmail.com> 2010-11-27 06:19:25 CST ---
I think it is a good idea to make the resampling quality adjustable, and here
is why.

As I said, I can't tell the proposed resampler from the "default" one
(speexrate) in alsa-plugins by ear, but still want their characteristics to be
as similar as possible (up to copying the entire impulse response table) so
that this bug has no chance to be reopened by "better" audiophiles. This indeed
brings up the question of CPU usage with 3D effects, that's why the quality
knob.

OTOH, Windows 2000 and XP already have a resampling quality knob. Does anyone
know the characteristics of their resampler or the location of the registry
value?

And even alsa-plugins and PulseAudio offer some presets with different quality
of resampling.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.



More information about the wine-bugs mailing list