[Bug 14717] resampled sound is horrible

wine-bugs at winehq.org wine-bugs at winehq.org
Fri Dec 30 15:27:31 CST 2011


http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14717

Andrew Eikum <aeikum at codeweavers.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Attachment #38064|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |
  Attachment #38100|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |

--- Comment #256 from Andrew Eikum <aeikum at codeweavers.com> 2011-12-30 15:27:31 CST ---
Created attachment 38186
  --> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=38186
Speex-based resampler patchset, improved positioning

(In reply to comment #253)
> Andrew, your resampler produces clicks. To test: run foobar2000 and play a wav
> file with the sample rate of 11025 Hz. And there is also a bug with 24-bit dsb
> support: sign extension has to happen in get(), not in put().

Indeed it did. I'm fairly certain it was due to the double-counting issue you
mentioned in comment 248. I think input samples were being used twice, but
didn't completely confirm that.

So here's another patchset, based on yours from comment 254. It contains a
first draft of a patch which removes the position conversions from primary to
secondary buffer, and instead has the secondary buffers maintain their position
independently. Then we only advance the secondary buffer by the number of
samples that Speex actually converted, fixing the double count issue. It fixes
the click problem -- or at least, the one I noticed using your instructions.

I'm still suspicious of the primary_mixpos member. It seems redundant, but I'm
not totally convinced yet. I'll give it a closer look on Monday. It would also
be nice to confirm that converting fewer frames than requested doesn't cause
problems (it shouldn't due to the prebuffer, I think, but this should be
verified).

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.



More information about the wine-bugs mailing list