[Bug 26098] New: rsaenh/rsaenh tests shows some valgrind warnings

[wine-bugs at winehq.org]

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26098

           Summary: rsaenh/rsaenh tests shows some valgrind warnings
           Product: Wine
           Version: 1.3.13
          Platform: x86
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Keywords: download, source, testcase
          Severity: trivial
          Priority: P2
         Component: rsaenh
        AssignedTo: wine-bugs at winehq.org
        ReportedBy: austinenglish at gmail.com


Invalid read of size 4
    at  CryptHashData (crypt.c:1753)
    by  test_hashes (rsaenh.c:571)
    by  func_rsaenh (rsaenh.c:2980)
    by  run_test (test.h:556)
    by  main (test.h:624)
  Address 0x7f0095d0 is 0 bytes inside a block of size 24 free'd
    at  notify_free (heap.c:262)
    by  RtlFreeHeap (heap.c:1747)
    by  HeapFree (heap.c:272)
    by  GlobalFree (heap.c:748)
    by  LocalFree (heap.c:1009)
    by  CryptReleaseContext (crypt.c:652)
    by  test_hashes (rsaenh.c:567)
    by  func_rsaenh (rsaenh.c:2980)
    by  run_test (test.h:556)
    by  main (test.h:624)

...

 Invalid read of size 4
    at  CryptDestroyHash (crypt.c:884)
    by  test_hashes (rsaenh.c:577)
    by  func_rsaenh (rsaenh.c:2980)
    by  run_test (test.h:556)
    by  main (test.h:624)
  Address 0x7f0095d0 is 0 bytes inside a block of size 24 free'd
    at  notify_free (heap.c:262)
    by  RtlFreeHeap (heap.c:1747)
    by  HeapFree (heap.c:272)
    by  GlobalFree (heap.c:748)
    by  LocalFree (heap.c:1009)
    by  CryptReleaseContext (crypt.c:652)
    by  test_hashes (rsaenh.c:567)
    by  func_rsaenh (rsaenh.c:2980)
    by  run_test (test.h:556)
    by  main (test.h:624)

...

 12 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost 
    at  notify_alloc (heap.c:254)
    by  RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1701)
    by  HeapAlloc (heap.c:267)
    by  GlobalAlloc (heap.c:360)
    by  LocalAlloc (heap.c:960)
    by  CryptCreateHash (crypt.c:739)
    by  test_hashes (rsaenh.c:563)
    by  func_rsaenh (rsaenh.c:2980)
    by  run_test (test.h:556)
    by  main (test.h:624)

...

 368 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost 
    at  notify_alloc (heap.c:254)
    by  RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1701)
    by  ???
    by  ???
    by  CryptCreateHash (crypt.c:747)
    by  test_hashes (rsaenh.c:563)
    by  func_rsaenh (rsaenh.c:2980)
    by  run_test (test.h:556)
    by  main (test.h:624)

...

there's also:
 Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
    at  RSAENH_CPDeriveKey (rsaenh.c:3926)
    by  CryptDeriveKey (crypt.c:844)
    by  test_schannel_provider (rsaenh.c:2373)
    by  func_rsaenh (rsaenh.c:2998)
    by  run_test (test.h:556)
    by  main (test.h:624)
  Uninitialised value was created by a client request
    at  mark_block_uninitialized (heap.c:208)
    by  initialize_block (heap.c:239)
    by  RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1702)
    by  new_object (handle.c:359)
    by  new_key (rsaenh.c:850)
    by  import_symmetric_key (rsaenh.c:2911)
    by  import_key (rsaenh.c:3066)
    by  RSAENH_CPImportKey (rsaenh.c:3103)
    by  CryptImportKey (crypt.c:1843)
    by  test_schannel_provider (rsaenh.c:2339)
    by  func_rsaenh (rsaenh.c:2998)
    by  run_test (test.h:556)
    by  main (test.h:624)

but I'm betting that http://source.winehq.org/patches/data/71353 may fix that
(which was caught today by +heap).

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.