[Bug 28056] Problems with sound under FreeBSD

wine-bugs at winehq.org wine-bugs at winehq.org
Mon Sep 26 13:06:34 CDT 2011


http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28056

--- Comment #29 from Jörg Höhle <hoehle at users.sourceforge.net> 2011-09-26 13:06:33 CDT ---
Here's my analysis of the logs. The result is not pretty.

+ Position deltas are related to deltas in time.

- What Wine computes as stream latency looks more like what ALSA
  returns as snd_pcm_delay, e.g. how much time it will take for the
  next written sample (inl. buffering) to hit the speaker.  Indeed
  it's based on DSP_GETODELAY, which should be used by GetPosition,
  not GetStreamLatency.

- Each iteration takes too much time, 256ms instead of slightly more
  than 100ms.  Either that or the HighPerformanceTimer is not trustworthy.

- Mateusz' Ubuntu OSS system seems to suffer particularly badly from
  that, typically taking 550ms per iteration.  Meanwhile "GetBuffer
  large (22500)" at every iteration signals that so many frames really
  get drained in that period (so the HP timer is probably right).

  What this means is that apps will spend a significant amount of time
  waiting, leaving less time for other things.  That might explain:
err:ntdll:RtlpWaitForCriticalSection section 0x12ba8c "?" wait timed out in
thread 002c, blocked by 0009, retrying (60 sec)
Cause: certainly blocking mode,
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2011-September/092519.html

- Matteusz' without vmix uses 192000Hz as default frequency.
  Obviously the card supports that but IMHO that doesn't make sense in
  the context of Wine.    The code too simply    uses audioinfo max_rate.

- Incorrect underrun handling. Even after 1s sleep, 500ms worth of
  samples was not drained entirely.  Or perhaps remaining samples less
  than some fragment size are left unplayed?  Perhaps that's an
  aretefact of the ugly    workaround in GetCurrentPadding?

Why do Alex and Mateusz get very different logs? I suspect that due to the
bugs, differences in OSS buffer and fragment sizes have tremendous impact. They
shouldn't.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.


More information about the wine-bugs mailing list