Installshield 6 (inter-proc) patches

[Roger Fujii]

lee wrote:
> 
> > > At this point, I would like to know if people agree up to this point.
> >
> > Try reading section 2C of the LGPL and tell me how it's good for commercial
> > companies.
> > If LGPL is so clean, simple and nice, why does mozilla/openoffice/apache/perl
> > not use it?
> it would appear thats changing and I hope this isn't duplication (
> according to mozills site this  re-licensing began 9/2001)
> =============
> 
> http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/relicensing-faq.html

They still don't use it *exclusively*.  They are doing this to reconcile the problems
created by the *GPL covered components.  Notice the last sentence of the first
paragraph:
"in particular identified Mozilla-related license issues that could arise with
developers
using the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) for their own code." (whatever
that
means in the mozilla context).

-r