Installshield 6 (inter-proc) patches

[Dimitrie O. Paun]

On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Roger Fujii wrote:

> lee wrote:
> > 
> > > > At this point, I would like to know if people agree up to this point.
> > >
> > > Try reading section 2C of the LGPL and tell me how it's good for commercial
> > > companies.
> > > If LGPL is so clean, simple and nice, why does mozilla/openoffice/apache/perl
> > > not use it?
> > it would appear thats changing and I hope this isn't duplication (
> > according to mozills site this  re-licensing began 9/2001)
> > =============
> > 
> > http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/relicensing-faq.html
> 
> They still don't use it *exclusively*.  They are doing this to reconcile the problems
> created by the *GPL covered components.  

And your point is??? Mozilla _is_ using the LGPL, and it seems to have won
over the MPL for whatever reasons. Developers prefer it. Which makes it
better. Why should we p*ss against the wind? Just to get wet?


--
Dimi.