mingwrap -> mingcc
David Fraser
davidf at sjsoft.com
Thu Dec 19 00:09:45 CST 2002
Francois Gouget wrote:
>On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
>
>
>
>>On December 18, 2002 03:36 pm, Francois Gouget wrote:
>>
>>
>[...]
>
>
>>> winegcc
>>>
>>>
>>Why not wgcc?
>>
>>
>
>I had the impression that we were going away from just using 'w' as the
>prefix and more towards using 'wine'. So I'm proposing both forms.
>
>
>
>>So I am OK with the following:
>> wgcc
>> mingcc
>> wmingcc
>>
>>
>
>I think the ones I prefer are 'wgcc' and 'winegcc'. In both cases we can
>add variants: wcl / winecl (Visual C++), wbcc / winebcc (Borland C++ if
>memory serves), etc.
>
>
>
I'm all for winegcc and these variants. It's not that much longer to
type, it's much
clearer (nobody's going to look at their /usr/bin directory and think
'what's wgcc?'),
and most of the time it's going to be in a Makefile anyway.
David
More information about the wine-devel
mailing list