WineCorp (was Re: Wine license change)
robert w hall
bobh at n-cantrell.demon.co.uk
Sun Feb 17 11:30:27 CST 2002
In article <20020213204809.A30749 at biscuit.chronic>, David Elliott
<dfe at tgwbd.org> writes
>On 2002.02.13 13:52 Ian Schmidt wrote:
>
>[BIG SNIP]
>> To put this back on topic, I don't see any immediate benefits from a LGPL
>>
>> license. If we knew what the threat to Wine Jeremy hinted at was, it
>> might
>> make for a more informed discussion. I also liked Gav's idea about
>> WineCorp
>> a lot as a compromise, and I'd love to see more dicussion of that and
>> less
>> licensing flaming.
>>
>
>Agreed. In my private mail to Alexandre I mentioned that we need some
>sort of "Wine Foundation". Apparently Gav has the same idea and at least
>one other person (you) seems to like it too.
I would really like _this_ part of the thread to continue too (*), with
comments from Codeweavers, and some of the other wine heavies perhaps
guiding 'us' with their insights.
Bob Hall (lurker :-) )
* (and other licence issues to be continued elsewhere, preferably off-
list)
--
robert w hall
More information about the wine-devel
mailing list