self-registerable standard DLLs
Tony Lambregts
tony_lambregts at telusplanet.net
Thu Jun 6 11:21:10 CDT 2002
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
>"John K. Hohm" <jhohm at acm.org> writes:
>
>
>
>>I noticed that the attempt to test comcat.dll on Win98 failed because
>>DllRegisterServer is a stub returning E_NOTIMPL. I have added the
>>registry entries for the component categories manager to winedefault.reg,
>>which should suffice for normal Wine installations. Despite this, is it
>>generally acceptable to have actual code to register/unregister a standard
>>COM server DLL in its Dll[Un]RegisterServer? It would be redundant for
>>normal Wine, but hey, it's not big or complex.
>>
>>
>
>Actually putting that in DllRegisterServer is arguably the right way
>to do it. What we should have is some kind of installation step that
>would register the Wine dlls, instead of having to put everything in
>winedefault.reg.
>
>
>
Would it be a good idea to create a bug report for this?... Or does
someone want to implement it right away...
Tony Lambregts
More information about the wine-devel
mailing list