Why start a COM local server twice?

[Medland, Bill]

Is this an oversight or a deliberate policy?

Remote_CoGetClassObject creates the local server process and hands over to
create_marshalled_proxy
If create_marshalled_proxy can't immediately find the pipe then it will
create the process again.

Is it safe to drop the first one?  How about the second?  It looks to me as
if Remote_CoGetClassObject is the only place that calls
create_marshalled_proxy so I presume we can remove either.

Bill