prupe at myrealbox.com
Thu Sep 26 12:09:22 CDT 2002
On 26 Sep 2002, dpaun at rogers.com wrote:
> Of course it does. Damn, I was tracking this bug myself, but I
> thought my changes introduced them. :) I'll look into it. But
> why the change in the first place???
It was my fault, sorry. I changed it because I had a crash where one of
those steps failed, but it left the freed pointer in the array to be used
later. I was hoping simply reordering things would prevent that, but I
guess I missed a dependency. I submitted another patch that puts the order
back the way it was and does the extra work in the cleanup instead.
Paul Rupe "She smiled, in the end."
p r u p e @ m y r e a l b o x . c o m
| Oppose government police-ware on your PC!
| Stop the Consumer Broadband and Digital Television Promotion Act!
More information about the wine-devel