manual patch tracking system for ntdll

Tue Apr 15 13:00:39 CDT 2003

On April 15, 2003 09:14 am, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> thomas.mertes at gmx.at writes:

snip

> > IMHO, if a patch is correct (can be verified by tests) it should be
> > applied, even if no application needs this functions (at the moment).
>
> There is a very big difference between "correct" and "verified by
> tests".

Hear, Hear!!!

snip

-- 
Bill Medland
ACCPAC International, Inc.
medbi01 at accpac.com
Corporate: www.accpac.com
Hosted Services: www.accpaconline.com