TaxCut and C++ exception handling
Dmitry Timoshkov
dmitry at baikal.ru
Sun Feb 16 21:47:14 CST 2003
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <dpaun at rogers.com> wrote:
> > IMHO Crossover Office has a better patch
> > which adds printing of the message "fixme:DLLNAME:APINAME: .spec empty
> > stub!"
>
> Doesn't this violate the general format we use for debug messages:
> <class>:<channel>:<message>
IMHO it doesn't. DLLNAME plays the role of the channel there.
> Maybe something like this fits a bit better:
> "fixme:stub:DLLNAME:APINAME: .spec empty stub!"
It should be understandable without mentioning the word "stub" two times
what the message is about.
> But if we have a channel for each DLL, which is actually not a bad idea,
> maybe it's not that bad afterall... :)
Well, that's actually not a debug channel of course, but a good approximation
(read: fake) of it.
--
Dmitry.
More information about the wine-devel
mailing list