winemaker problem

[Jeff Smith]

Yes there should be.  Currently execname.so is being created rather than
execname.exe.so.  The patch I submitted a few hours ago (don't know
if it has made it through yet) includes a fix for this.

Copying the file is actually what I did for several weeks, rather than
dig in to winemaker to fix the problem.  But I get fed up and started
putting together a patch for this several days ago.  So now it is ready
to roll.  Good timing, yes?

-- Jeff S


>From: Shachar Shemesh <wine-devel at sun.consumer.org.il>
>
>Shouldn't there be a winemine-hcs.exe.so file there?
>If you rename winemine-hcs.so to winemine-hcs.exe.so, what happens?
>
>            Shachar
>
>Hans Christian Studt wrote:
>
>>It still cannot find 'winemine-hcs.exe'.
>>What seems to comes nearest is
>>-rwxr-xr-x        969 jan  1 21:00 winemine-hcs
>>-rwxrwxr-x     793446 jan  1 21:00 winemine-hcs.so
>>-rw-rw-r--      44160 jan  1 21:00 winemine-hcs.spec.c
>>-rw-rw-r--      92648 jan  1 21:00 winemine-hcs.spec.o
>>-rw-rw-r--        173 jan  1 20:59 winemine.exe.dbg.c
>>-rw-rw-r--       2040 jan  1 21:00 winemine.exe.dbg.o
>>-rw-rw-r--      43665 jan  1 15:39 winemine.exe.spec.c
>>
>>I sure hope someone can help out - because I plan to try to see if I can 
>>make some of those 7.000 win32 applications over at sourceforge.net 
>>compile under winelib.

_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus