__WINE__ vs. __WINESRC__

[Alexandre Julliard]

"Dimitrie O. Paun" <dpaun at rogers.com> writes:

> On January 1, 2003 07:40 pm, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> > I think __WINE__ is best, let's just rename the internal one. BTW this
> 
> Cool, but to what? __WINESRC__? __WINEBUILD__? __WINEINTERNAL__?

It doesn't really matter, just pick the one you prefer.

> Indeed. How do you want to do this? Can we do the rename, and then
> eliminate some of them? This would be best for me, since I can complete
> the work on wxWindows.

Sure, we can do the rename first.

> There are many things of this form:
> 
> include/mediaobj.h:#ifndef __WINE__
> include/mediaobj.h-#include "rpc.h"
> include/mediaobj.h-#include "rpcndr.h"
> include/mediaobj.h-#ifndef COM_NO_WINDOWS_H
> include/mediaobj.h-#include "windows.h"
> include/mediaobj.h-#include "ole2.h"
> include/mediaobj.h-#endif
> include/mediaobj.h-#endif
> 
> Do you want to keep them?

No, these should be removed. The same effect can be achieved by
defining COM_NO_WINDOWS_H in the C files that use the include.

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
julliard at winehq.com