distcc and wine
Martin Pool
mbp at samba.org
Wed Jan 8 17:12:54 CST 2003
On 8 Jan 2003, Paul Millar <paulm at astro.gla.ac.uk> wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> On a similar note, I've been investigating OpenMOSIX on and off (mostly
> off) for doing distributed compiling. In general, I've found it not
> particularly stable (although its improving) and the performance not
> particularly great -- although I've not had time to investigate the causes
> of these problems. Besides, compiling code is quite a tricky task for it
> to schedule/migrate.
I haven't tried it myself but I would have expected the short, intense
jobs generated by compilation to be a problem.
> A reduction in compilation time by a factor of 2.6 (for three machines)
> isn't bad at all!
>
> If you have the time, could you repeat this with different values for the
> -j option? Timing how long it takes with -j2 (and perhaps -j3 and -j4)
> would be interesting.
Yes, I've been meaning to add that to the benchmark tool. I'll let
you know.
> Also, repeat the compilation several times for each value of -j and taking
> the mean and standard deviation would be interesting too.
In informal measurements it seems to be quite reproducible. The sd is
typically only a few percent of the overall time. But that might be
an interesting option to add too.
--
Martin
More information about the wine-devel
mailing list