distcc and wine

Martin Pool mbp at samba.org
Wed Jan 8 17:12:54 CST 2003


On  8 Jan 2003, Paul Millar <paulm at astro.gla.ac.uk> wrote:
> Hi Martin,
> 
> On a similar note, I've been investigating OpenMOSIX on and off (mostly
> off) for doing distributed compiling.  In general, I've found it not
> particularly stable (although its improving) and the performance not
> particularly great -- although I've not had time to investigate the causes
> of these problems.  Besides, compiling code is quite a tricky task for it
> to schedule/migrate.

I haven't tried it myself but I would have expected the short, intense
jobs generated by compilation to be a problem.

> A reduction in compilation time by a factor of 2.6 (for three machines)  
> isn't bad at all!
> 
> If you have the time, could you repeat this with different values for the
> -j option? Timing how long it takes with -j2 (and perhaps -j3 and -j4)
> would be interesting.

Yes, I've been meaning to add that to the benchmark tool.  I'll let
you know.

> Also, repeat the compilation several times for each value of -j and taking
> the mean and standard deviation would be interesting too.

In informal measurements it seems to be quite reproducible.  The sd is
typically only a few percent of the overall time.  But that might be
an interesting option to add too.
  
-- 
Martin 



More information about the wine-devel mailing list