FHS vs LSB

[Marcus Meissner]

On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 10:20:29PM -0500, Tom Wickline wrote:
> In updating the Packagers Guide I plan to replace FHS with LSB
> any objections ?
> 
> FHS = http://www.pathname.com/fhs/
> 
> LSB = http://www.linuxbase.org/

The FHS is a part of the LSB standard.

And we cannot be LSB compliant, we need way more in the matter of system
calls and ioctls than LSB allows ;)

Ciao, Marcus