[RESENT]: Fixed winedbg example configuration
jon at siliconcircus.com
Fri Jul 18 01:09:58 CDT 2003
Eric Pouech wrote:
>> These are two separate changes:
>> a) Wine's registry needs to preserve ordering (c++ builder, presumably
>> among others)
>> b) BiGgUn wants to reorder the winedbg lines for some reason. I'm not
>> saying he's right (I don't understand why he wants to reorder things
>> like that), but I am saying that if he is wrong, it's not because this
>> would be reordered anyway. Basically, I'm not supporting his patch,
>> I'm saying Alexandre's reason for rejection is wrong.
> I still agree with Alexandre here. Order of keys in registry doesn't
> matter when loading, moreover, next time wine exits, the keys get
> automatically reordered (and saved), so I don't understand the need of
> the key reordering.
The point is that the automatic reordering should go away because it's
causing at least one bug that I know of. Keys should be read out of the
registry in the same order they were written to it. Thus, saying "this
is a no-op because keys are reordered" isn't a valid argument against
BiGgUn's patch. You could equally say "This patch seems completely
pointless, key re-ordering or not", though and I'd be quite happy.
Lead Programmer, Silicon Circus Ltd.
More information about the wine-devel