Licensing Question

[Steven Edwards]

The interfaces are public information and can be gotten from any number of means. I dont know why
we even have license information in the headers as it has caused confusion from day 1 the LGPL
statment was added. If you are still worried about using the WINE headers to fix Mingw (It needs
it) then use ReWind.

Thanks
Steven

> Op donderdag 31 juli 2003 16:24, schreef Anthony Tuininga:
> > The MingW32 project is developing its own set of Windows headers under a
> > different license than Wine (which uses LGPL, right?) and I have noticed
> > (using both projects) that the Wine headers are more complete in a
> > number of areas. I was wondering if it would be acceptable to use the
> > Wine headers as a source for filling in gaps in the MinGW32 headers? In
> > essence, would the Wine group be willing to allow this cross pollination
> > since (clearly) it would be a violation of the licenses as they stand
> > today. Any thoughts on this? Or am I treading into a minefield?? :-)
> 
> 


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com