additional user32 .spec entries was:Re: CVS - Notes Breakage
bon at elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de
Tue May 6 06:01:09 CDT 2003
>>>>> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Julliard <julliard at winehq.com> writes:
Alexandre> Uwe Bonnes <bon at elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> writes:
>> Wine happily returns a valid function adress, also obvious the same
>> at least for different stubbed functions in the same dll. I searched
>> for a way to return perhaps some flag in LdrGetProcedureAddress for
>> that case, but I was not able to find something. I didn't find a way
>> how LdrGetProcedureAddress could get that address and compare with
>> the function address calculated for the requested function.
>> Perhaps Eric or some other guru can...
>> I propose that GetProcAddress evaluates that flag and should return 0
>> for stubs.
Alexandre> There's no reason to do that; the whole point of declaring a
Alexandre> stub is to provide a function address. If we don't want that
Alexandre> function at all it should simply be commented out in the spec
as your patches causes breackage, please revisit with Alexandre's rule
Uwe Bonnes bon at elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de
Institut fuer Kernphysik Schlossgartenstrasse 9 64289 Darmstadt
--------- Tel. 06151 162516 -------- Fax. 06151 164321 ----------
More information about the wine-devel