additional user32 .spec entries was:Re: CVS - Notes Breakage

[Uwe Bonnes]

>>>>> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Julliard <julliard at winehq.com> writes:

    Alexandre> Uwe Bonnes <bon at elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> writes:
    >> Wine happily returns a valid function adress, also obvious the same
    >> at least for different stubbed functions in the same dll.  I searched
    >> for a way to return perhaps some flag in LdrGetProcedureAddress for
    >> that case, but I was not able to find something. I didn't find a way
    >> how LdrGetProcedureAddress could get that address and compare with
    >> the function address calculated for the requested function.
    >> 
    >> Perhaps Eric or some other guru can...
    >> 
    >> I propose that GetProcAddress evaluates that flag and should return 0
    >> for stubs.

    Alexandre> There's no reason to do that; the whole point of declaring a
    Alexandre> stub is to provide a function address. If we don't want that
    Alexandre> function at all it should simply be commented out in the spec
    Alexandre> file.

Andi,

as your patches causes breackage, please revisit with Alexandre's rule
applied.

Bye
-- 
Uwe Bonnes                bon at elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de

Institut fuer Kernphysik  Schlossgartenstrasse 9  64289 Darmstadt
--------- Tel. 06151 162516 -------- Fax. 06151 164321 ----------