Wine folks interested in a CHM spec?
Dimitrie O. Paun
dimi at intelliware.ca
Wed May 28 11:14:17 CDT 2003
On 28 May 2003, Mike Hearn wrote:
> Running through 3 translation layers is going to suck though.
> KHTML -> KWQ -> Wine -> Linux
I don't think it's all that bad. Currently we have:
KHTML -> WebCore -> Cocoa
KHTML -> QT -> Linux
I don't think KWQ will add much overhead, it's going to be essentially:
KHTML -> Wine -> Linux
And I don't think QT/X11 is all that much faster than Wine.
> Bearing in mind KWQ would have to provide a pthreads wrapper around
> win32, then have win32 mapped back onto pthreads - ouch!
But we do integrate with pthreads right now, it should just work, no?
More information about the wine-devel