PATCH: tools/winegcc/utils.c -- casts

[Dimitrie O. Paun]

On October 30, 2003 07:28 pm, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> > -        if (n > -1 && n < size) return p;
> > -     size = min( size*2, n+1 );
> > +        if (n > -1 && (size_t)n < size) return p;
> > +     size = min( size*2, (size_t)n+1 );
>
> Once at it, could you please explain to me what the hell is
> going on here (min)?

Well, the way I see it, it's just trying to minimize memory
usage in a portable manner. Normally, vsnprintf() should return
the necessary size of the buffer (in n), if the current size
is too small. If however vsnprintf() fails to return that,
we should just double the size of the buffer until we have
something large enough.

Now, the way the code it's written right now will not work
if vsnprintf() returns -1 for failure. Question is, do we
really need to worry about vsnprintf() not returning the
correct size of the required buffer?

BTW, IIRC the code has been taken from one of glibc's man pages...

-- 
Dimi.