FAQ update

Wed Sep 10 04:29:58 CDT 2003

On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:

> On September 8, 2003 01:23 pm, Francois Gouget wrote:
> > As far as I can see the differences between winehq.dsl and default .dsl
>
> Well, if we keep winehq.dsl, why do we need a perl script to patch
> the output?

We need the perl script to remove everything outside the <body> tag and
to put  as the first line. I'm pretty sure
this could be done by hacking the dsl file and yes, this would be much
better. But I'm sure haev no idea how and I don't have the time nor the
will to spend days researching it. Since nobody else voluntered to do it
either I wrote a script to hack the generated html file instead.

> The HTML stuff should be generated with the site
> default.dsl anyway. We should instead patch winehq.dsl to generate
> the required output instead. And it should be moved to the tools/
> CVS module as well.

Either way once make_winehq is in the tools CVS, winehq.dsl and
make_winehq can be removed from Wine's CVS. However I think we should
keep Wine's default.dsl file (just like we have a print.dsl file).

-- 
Francois Gouget         fgouget at free.fr        http://fgouget.free.fr/
                         Stolen from an Internet user:
              "f u cn rd ths, u cn gt a gd jb n cmptr prgrmmng !"