ntdll/kernel32: #36

[Alexandre Julliard]

Pouech Eric DMI AEI CAEN <pouech-eric at wanadoo.fr> writes:

> My first (dumb) reaction was if it's in there, it means we need it
> for some cases. But, I don't want to support this codepage option
> for no real need, so if no one objects, we could remove it.

It's here because we didn't have CP_UNIXCP support then. We could
definitely remove it.

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
julliard at winehq.com