update the faq take 2 : faq-2.diff

[Tom]

Andreas Mohr wrote:

> Hmm...
> Rewind is an important part for companies who choose to not publish
> all of their source under the (L)GPL (but hopefully do publish smaller
> utilities not essential to their core business :-).
> As such it might be useful to keep the reference.

Hello Andi,

Many people release there code as X11/LGPL but the project
at http://rewind.sourceforge.net/ is for the most part dead!

If the tree was kept upto date and X11 patches were merged in
I could see why some would want to keep a reference to it, but its just
not that way. So in reality all were doing by providing this reference
is sending people to two year old code that is missing *many* X11
patches that have been sent to wine-patches.


> (to such companies at least ;-)
> Are there any "GPL-unencumbered" (ugh, gotta hate that word ;)
> alternatives? I don't know of any, so...

Are there any upto date, maintained X11 projects?
I don't know of any, so........

Cheers,
Tom

Who feels his patch is correct.

> 
> Greetings,
> 
> Andreas Mohr
> (who certainly would not be too unaffected by the non-availability
> of a rewind tree ;-)
> 
> 
>