Dimitrie O. Paun
dpaun at rogers.com
Tue Aug 17 23:22:50 CDT 2004
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 04:03:33PM -0700, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Robert Shearman <rob at codeweavers.com> writes:
> I think it's better to let the debugger take care of that. If you
> don't want a real breakpoint you could define a custom exception to
> tell winedbg to just dump the backtrace and continue.
I am not 100% how the patch that Robert's proposing would work in
practice, but I can tell you (from working with Java for a long
time now) that having readily available backtraces is invaluable.
I for one love backtraces, but on the other hand I don't much
care for debuggers. Having access to them without being forced
to go through the debuger would be much appreciated.
More information about the wine-devel