Cleaning up W->A calls
truiken at gmail.com
Thu Jul 1 01:24:12 CDT 2004
K i will use A->W calls. What documentation are you referring to?
I'd like to read up on the subject.
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 07:00:58 -0700 (PDT), Steven Edwards
<steven_ed4153 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi James,
> --- James Hawkins <truiken at comcast.net> wrote:
> > If I'm totally off the mark, let me know, and if there are other
> > jobs I
> > could be doing, let me know as well because I would like to
> > contribute,
> > but I'm not exactly sure what to do yet. Thankyou for your time.
> Welcome! I dont think it matters from a performance point of view. From
> my reading of documentation regarding Windows NT it seems they have
> abut a 20% performance hit on the ASCII calls vs the Unicode calls. I
> think that they implement both ASCII and Unicode rather than have ASCII
> call the unicode functions. (This is due to the fact that they had a
> semi-share source base with Win9x). Most of Wine just has the A
> function call the W function so I would follow this standard. It will
> reduce code duplication and prob'l lessen bugs.
> Do you Yahoo!?
> New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
More information about the wine-devel