Win32 packages released on sourceforge

[Ferenc Wagner]

Paul Millar <paulm at astro.gla.ac.uk> writes:

> On Mon, 22 Mar 2004, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>
>> Paul Millar <paulm at astro.gla.ac.uk> writes:
>>
>>> For some reason, running make inside dlls directory
>>> generated more *_test.exe's than a simple "make -k".
>> 
>> I guess this may be caused by the lib*.a import libs in
>> dlls: using those of Wine is not the same as using the
>> MinGW versions.
>
> So, should I just do a "make -k" from the base directory
> and leave broken tests to fail?  (I haven't tried with the
> current code, so this may be redundant now.)

I don't know, really.  I'm not sure what these import
libraries really are, just guessing.  Can anybody help out?

>>> I've also removed the urlmon test [...] just to allow
>>> winetest.exe to build. Do you know if that's been fixed?
>> 
>> Probably not.
>
> So, should we remove (from Makefile.in) tests that
> currently block winetest.exe from building?  To me,
> building /something/ is better than nothing.  Extra tests
> can be added once they're building correctly.

Yes, it's probably better than making the make process more
forgiving.  Requires maintenance, though.
-- 
Feri.