symbol hiding
James Courtier-Dutton
James at superbug.demon.co.uk
Fri May 14 08:24:51 CDT 2004
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
>
>
> Also, I personally feel a bit not comfortable when someone (for any
> reason) is looking into a binary and sees names of internal interfaces
> not appropriate for external learn/use. I find it ugly that I can't fully
> control such basic things in the ELF world.
>
What is wrong with seeing names of internal interfaces?
If someone wants to use a lib you publish, they just look in the .h file
to find out how to interface with it. They won't be looking in the
binary file to find out how to use it.
I expect that one of the reasons why one can't control "such basic
things in the ELF world" is that no-one has really asked for that
feature yet. Most software in the linux world is open source, so why
would anyone ever want to hide stuff?
If you don't want to port your application to the open source world,
then, probably the best thing for you to do would be to make sure that
your MS Windows application runs well in wine.
Wine does not support all MS Windows features yet, and some it does
support are slow. So, if you just check that your program does not use
any of the un-implemented win32 functions, your application should work
well. If you have to use some win32 feature not yet implemented in wine,
then you might have to implement it in wine and submit a patch to wine.
There are some well know applications out there that work on both
windows and linux natively. E.g. The game Quake.
They have never complained about the .ELF format.
Cheers
James
More information about the wine-devel
mailing list