Kernel 2.6.9 - Issue Found
mike at navi.cx
Tue Nov 16 08:34:28 CST 2004
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 17:57:53 -0700, Jesse Allen wrote:
> It doesn't seem to fix the copy protection problem. So I'm wondering a few
> things. Does wine need to be patched? This new patch seems to be related to
> a chunk of code added in patch #2 mentioned in the original posting. I've
> tried 2.6.10-rc2 with patch #1 reversed and patch 1+3 reversed. No difference
> this time.
My understanding was that Wine would not have to be patched, but if the
latest -rc2 sources still show the regression maybe I'm wrong. Eric?
More information about the wine-devel