No RichEdit20A window class

[William Poetra Yoga H]

--- Michael Ost <most at museresearch.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 03:22, Mike McCormack wrote:
> > Michael Ost wrote:
> > 
> > > (1) The wine bug (I think) is that riched32.dll is registering the wrong
> > > window class name. Here's a suggested patch:
> > 
> > RICHEDIT_CLASS20A is provided by riched20.dll, not riched32.dll.  The 
> > windows 2000 implementation uses riched20.dll to implement riched32.dll 
> >   (ie. moves the richedit code to riched20.dll and implements the 
> > RICHEDIT_CLASS10A class using the new RICHEDIT_CLASS20A class.
> > 
> > In short, the existing code registers the correct class name, but we 
> > need to make a new dll dlls/riched20, and do alot of work on the 
> > richedit control :)
> 
> This isn't quite clear to me. It sounds like you are saying there is a
> riched20.dll in wine, but I can't find one. Are these statements
> correct?
> 

He's saying that "riched32.dll in wine registers the correct class name, which
is RICHEDIT_CLASS10A. To implement RICHEDIT_CLASS20A, we need to make another
dll, that is, riched20.dll"


> * Wine's only implements RichEdit10A via riched32.dll. Wine does not
> implement RichEdit20A. 
> 
> * Win2K (and later) provides riched20.dll which implements
> RICHEDIT_CLASS20A. This one I can verify as true on my winxp system.
> 
> * There are significant differences between the two window classes
>  

I think all 3 statements are correct.

> My winelib app is hosting a 3rd party DLL which is specifically
> requesting "RichEdit20A". That suggests that the DLL was built with
> win2K or later, from what you were saying. Sounds like my options are
> to:
> 
> * hack their request to use the window class registered by wine's
> riched32.dll. How well could I expect this to work? How big are the
> diffs between 10A and 20A?
> 
> * get them to provide win2k's riched20.dll
> 
> * have them change their DLL to ask for RichEdit10A instead
> 
> * implement riched20.dll in Wine. Sounds like a big job!
> 
> Sound right? Any comments? Thanks a bunch... mo
> 

Last option is the best :)



		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today! 
http://my.yahoo.com