MSCMS: new dll
Boaz Harrosh
boaz at hishome.net
Mon Sep 20 06:43:34 CDT 2004
Mike Hearn wrote:
> For what it's worth I don't think we should start excluding new DLLs
> from the tree until they reach maturity (what is mature anyway?). If
> they aren't in there people probably won't hack on them.
>
> The flip side is then we end up with a ton of stub DLLs and programs
> that could work in its absence now break. This is a danger whenever
> you add stubs, it's happened with function stubs as well.
Also maybe these DLLs can Just be excluded from the "make Install".
There should be 2 DLL templates (in Makfile) one for installable DLL and
one for not-installable. The packagers should make it a rule to only
include Installable DLLs.
More information about the wine-devel
mailing list