crypt32: CryptProtectData/CryptUnprotectData take 2
jorishuizer at planet.nl
Tue Apr 5 16:52:24 CDT 2005
Kees Cook wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 02:32:11PM +0900, Mike McCormack wrote:
>>The new patch looks good. I should have mentioned before that writing a
>>test case will help your patch be accepted. Did you have any test code
>>about that you could turn into a test case for your newly implemented
> Sure, I can write something. I'll look around for docs on how to run
> tests -- I didn't find that when I looked around this morning.
> Also: I realize I should provide full documentation for the actual
> Windows API calls themselves. I documented everything BUT those. :)
> What's the convention for the number after the API name? I've seen some
> with numbers, and some with just an "@" sign?
I think it's an "@" for normal calls, and a number for an 'ordinal'
call; (though don't really know what the difference is... ;))
More information about the wine-devel