shell32, ntdll tests

[James Hawkins]

On Apr 11, 2005 4:34 PM, Aaron Arvey <aarvey at cs.hmc.edu> wrote:
> More specifically, is it worth the time to write tests for ntdll/loader.c
> and ntdll/virtual.c?  It seems that these files would be used to load any
> program, so if there were any bugs, I'm guessing they would become
> apparent immediately and thus having formal tests would be somewhat
> pointless.  Please correct (or reaffirm) me as I am going to write some
> tests in my spare time and I want to make sure that they'd be useful to
> the wine project.

Regression/conformance tests are almost never pointless even if they
just reaffirm what is already obvious.  They serve two purposes: to
conform to windows behaviour, and to make sure later code changes
don't create regressions.  It would be well worth all of our time for
anyone to write more tests, so please send them in.

-- 
James Hawkins