secur32: add first SSPI test to actually see what work needs to be done

[Kai Blin]

* Stefan Leichter <Stefan.Leichter at camLine.com> [03/08/05, 19:47:08]:
 
> you have to include your test into programs/winetest/Makefile.in too, to get 
> your test into the winetest.exe, which delivers the results for 
> http://test.winehq.org/data/ .

Whoops. Ok, sure. I'll fix that when I've fixed the patch.

> 
> Please write the test either for QuerySecurityPackageInfoA or 
> QuerySecurityPackageInfoW.

Huh? I think the correct function will automatically be called when I
call QuerySecurityPackageInfo() with either SEC_CHAR or SEC_WCHAR.
Or is that an unusual way to test? I can change it to use the ...A and
...W functions easily.

Kai 

-- 
Kai Blin, (blin at gmx dot net)
Alive without breath,
As cold as death;
Never thirsty, ever drinking,
All in mail never clinking.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/attachments/20050804/05254436/attachment.pgp