RtlFillMemoryUlong

[Mike McCormack]

Dietrich Teickner wrote:
> With one inline asm-statement this function would smaler and faster.

Nobody is really going to notice the difference this brings, almost no 
real code uses Rtl* functions (programs, not Windows dlls), and you're 
making a maintence problem by adding assembly code which depends on gcc/x86.

There's much better ways to optimize Wine.  Macroscopic optimizations, 
such as strategically changing the order of a few functions could give 
us great performance benefit, and not introduce the code management 
problems that platform and compiler specific optimizations have.

Mike