MSVCRT: Re-implement *printf
alp108 at student.cs.york.ac.uk
Sat Jan 29 14:06:02 CST 2005
Jesse Allen wrote:
>>Sorry for being late at responding. I took a look at it finally like
>>a week ago. You can definately break up the patch.
>Erm, nevermind on breaking it up yet. I started to myself, but I
>think it's more trouble than it's worth right now. We can have that
>done later if that is what is wanted to have it accepted.
>I had another idea to help testing. I added a comparison test in
>_vsnprintf to go ahead and see if there is any difference between libc
>and wine by calling libc's version. If there is a difference, it will
>print a warning. Here's an obvious example in action while running
Cool, that's a good idea. I was holding off on responding to the other 2
posts until I'd come up with a meaningful response, but it's probably
better to acknowledge them :).
In response to Juan's comments then:
1. Already done :). I had several test cases (including one for the
example you give) committed some time ago.
2. Well I can certainly give it some thought, though I'm not sure yet
how I'd want to do it. This is the part that made me want to wait before
responding, since I don't have anything actually useful to add yet.
Anyway, I'm not ignoring you, and will respond decently when I've found
the time to play with this a bit :). Thanks for the input.
More information about the wine-devel