Discussion on Bug tracking database

[Tony Lambregts]

tony_lambregts at telusplanet.net wrote:
> Ann and Jason Edmeades wrote:
>> I'd like to completely clarify that :
>> - If _easily_ recreatable then a comment can be put in to keep it 
>> active by
>> the person looking at it, but otherwise anything which is inactive for 2
>> months when the action was with the raiser can be closed.
>>
>> If so, which closing code (does it matter?!)? With no changes to 
>> bugzilla I
>> would suggest an INVALID closing code with appropriate words added.
>>
>> Once agreed, we can have some fun clearing out some old rubbish. Looking
>> through the old bugs and trying to reproduce a few, there are some easily
>> recreatable basic bugs but those where there is nothing to go on 
>> really cant
>> be progressed!
> 
> 
> Well if the attached patch is OK for Jeremy then you will not need to 
> use "INVALID" and you use "ABANDONED" instead. ;^)
> 
Jeremy committed the patch... You can now resolve a bug as "ABANDONED" :^)

--

Tony Lambregts