Discussion on Bug tracking database
tony.lambregts at gmail.com
Wed Mar 9 20:07:55 CST 2005
tony_lambregts at telusplanet.net wrote:
> Ann and Jason Edmeades wrote:
>> I'd like to completely clarify that :
>> - If _easily_ recreatable then a comment can be put in to keep it
>> active by
>> the person looking at it, but otherwise anything which is inactive for 2
>> months when the action was with the raiser can be closed.
>> If so, which closing code (does it matter?!)? With no changes to
>> bugzilla I
>> would suggest an INVALID closing code with appropriate words added.
>> Once agreed, we can have some fun clearing out some old rubbish. Looking
>> through the old bugs and trying to reproduce a few, there are some easily
>> recreatable basic bugs but those where there is nothing to go on
>> really cant
>> be progressed!
> Well if the attached patch is OK for Jeremy then you will not need to
> use "INVALID" and you use "ABANDONED" instead. ;^)
Jeremy committed the patch... You can now resolve a bug as "ABANDONED" :^)
More information about the wine-devel