Discussion on Bug tracking database

[Raphael]

On Thursday 10 March 2005 03:07, Tony Lambregts wrote:
> tony_lambregts at telusplanet.net wrote:
> > Ann and Jason Edmeades wrote:
> >> I'd like to completely clarify that :
> >> - If _easily_ recreatable then a comment can be put in to keep it
> >> active by
> >> the person looking at it, but otherwise anything which is inactive for 2
> >> months when the action was with the raiser can be closed.
> >>
> >> If so, which closing code (does it matter?!)? With no changes to
> >> bugzilla I
> >> would suggest an INVALID closing code with appropriate words added.
> >>
> >> Once agreed, we can have some fun clearing out some old rubbish. Looking
> >> through the old bugs and trying to reproduce a few, there are some
> >> easily recreatable basic bugs but those where there is nothing to go on
> >> really cant
> >> be progressed!
> >
> > Well if the attached patch is OK for Jeremy then you will not need to
> > use "INVALID" and you use "ABANDONED" instead. ;^)
>
> Jeremy committed the patch... You can now resolve a bug as "ABANDONED" :^)


Hi,

it will be perfect if we can have more specifics components:
 - wine-directx-dmusic
 - wine-directx-dsound
 - wine-directx-ddraw (old directx code < dx8)
 - wine-directx-d3d (new directx code >= dx8)

As wine-directx is too much generic
and most of errors are dsound problems 

Thx

Regards,
Raphael
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/attachments/20050310/e408071f/attachment.pgp