Commercial support

[David Gümbel]

On Dienstag 03 Mai 2005 16:43, Brian Vincent wrote:
> On 5/3/05, Shachar Shemesh <wine-devel at shemesh.biz> wrote:
> > I can suggest a simple rule to go by, as to whether to include a
> > company or not. In order to be included, a company has to show that it
> > has contributed (via it's employees or directly) a non-trivial patch to
> > wine. We can even limit it to "in the past year". At the moment, I
>
> At some point over the next few weeks I'll throw something together
> (feel free to beat me to it.)

Good!

> I don't think we need any criteria about contribuing to Wine or a
> "platinum" level.  If you're crazy enough^H^H^H^H^H able to do
> commercial support then we should advertise it.  There's plenty of
> companies who can do support without the knowledge to contribute.  In
> fact, you could think of them offering support as their way of
> contributing.  Support companies can also 'escalate' to someone else
> if coding is involved.

Exactly.

> Also, I'll bet we won't have to worry about the list being too big any
> time in the near future.
> Let's not worry about that now.  A lot of names would be good.

I absolutely agree.


Cheers,



David
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 234 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/attachments/20050503/b75bd14b/attachment.pgp