Dimitrie O. Paun
dpaun at rogers.com
Wed May 4 07:51:26 CDT 2005
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 03:22:34PM -0500, Jeremy White wrote:
> site should be open to anyone that requests to
> be listed there, and that it should be in alphabetical
Name recognition matters. In fact, for Open Source companies
it may be the only thing they have to work with. As such,
I think the order is important. I'm afraid that going the
alphabetical order way we're sending the wrong message:
"Don't bother sending patches in, just choose a company
name that sorts high". And ultimately, this is bad for Wine.
Also, this seems to be blown out of proportion: none of the
possible candidates have a problem with a ranked list.
In fact, I think 3 out of 4 supported the idea :) Why not
just do that?
More information about the wine-devel