DirectSound, new patch available for testing
Davin McCall
davmac at davmac.org
Mon Nov 7 17:46:36 CST 2005
Juergen,
Sorry for the slow reply. Thanks for responding. Because a couple of people (including yourself) had bad results with this patch, I've put it on hold for the moment, except for the alsa-driver part which has now gone into wine CVS. That alone gives a good improvement on my own system (and I'm sure that it's correct, whereas the dsound stuff is more complicated).
I think there are some improvements that can still be made to the Direct Sound implementation, so I plan to continue work on it at some point.
Davin
On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 02:18:30 +0100
Juergen Wieczorek <juergenw_ at web.de> wrote:
> Dear Davin,
>
> in the past days I have been testing your 'old' patch with wine-0.9 on
> my Fedora Core 3 system (kernel-2.6.12-.1381_FC3, alsa-lib-1.0.6-8.FC3,
> Soundblaster Live PCI = emu10k1), using Diablo2-LoD (patch 1.11b -
> 3DSound = no)
>
> Now I have also tried your new patch.
>
> Outcome in short : sound output got worse for me with the new patch.
>
> Outcome in detail (for ALSA):
>
> A)Old patch - DirectSound settings:
>
> 1)EmulDriver=N, HardwareAcceleration=Emulation
> Blizzard Intro = flawless
> Game Intro = flawless
> Game Sound = altogether fluently, some sounds start to miss when in
> thick melee
>
> 2)EmulDriver=N, HardwareAcceleration=Basic/Standard/Full
> Blizzard Intro = completely jarred
> Game Intro = with jerks
> Game Sound = jarred and jerky with large sound holes(dead sound)
>
>
> B)New patch - DirectSound settings:
>
> 1)EmulDriver=N, HardwareAcceleration=Emulation
> Blizzard Intro = flawless
> Game Intro = flawless
> Game Sound = persistent audible crackling
>
> 2)EmulDriver=N, HardwareAcceleration=Basic/Standard/Full
> Blizzard Intro = some audible jerks
> Game Intro = flawless
> Game Sound = persistent audible crackling
>
> The new patch seems to produce less console output of
> "err:dsound:DSOUND_PhaseCancel length not a multiple of block size"
> than the old patch and "len" seems to be of shorter size.
>
>
> I have counterchecked with the unpatched wine-0.9 and it is almost the
> same performance as with the 'new' patch, only that the Blizzard Intro
> runs flawlessly all the time, no matter what setting I choose for
> HardwareAcceleration.
>
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> --
> Juergen Wieczorek
> Hamburg / Germany
>
>
>
>
More information about the wine-devel
mailing list