Measuring Wine's API completeness

[Steven Edwards]

Hi,

On 11/10/05, Michael Jung <mjung at iss.tu-darmstadt.de> wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> talking to David Gümbel today the idea came up that it might be worth it to
> introduce an additional section in the comments that document the exported
> APIs. Something like 'IMPLEMENTATION STATUS', which would document the
> author's opinion on how complete the implementation of a given API is. We
> could introduce a classification scheme similar to:

<snip>

> 1. We could generate the 'Wine DLLs Status' page automatically with every
> release and we would have a historical record in cvs, which gives another
> view on the progress we make.

We have a dynamic page like this for ReactOS though I don't like it
because it only supports implemented and unimplemented tags in the
function comment. Having a semi-implemented tag would be nice.
Alexandre did not like our use of the @implemented and @unimplemented
tags at the time because it did not take in to account APIs that were
partly implemented like your propose.

http://svn.reactos.com/api/index2.html

It would be really great if the two projects could agree on a system.

Thanks
Steven