Need help debugging a memory corruption bug in shfldr_unixfs.c

[Michael Jung]

Hello Dimi,

On Thursday 08 September 2005 23:37, Phil Krylov wrote:
> Michael Jung <mjung at iss.tu-darmstadt.de> wrote:
> > Wouldn't it be enough to call notify_click after notify_itemactivate?
> > I've attached a modification of your patch, which does just this. Seems
> > to work fine for me.
>
> Probably, but what if some apps depend on order in which these
> notifications are sent? (assuming we already send them in the right order)

It seems that the code in it's current form was written by you:

http://cvs.winehq.org/cvsweb/wine/dlls/comctl32/listview.c.diff?r1=1.204&r2=1.205

Do you see a problem to move the notify_click below the notify_itemactivate?

Bye,
-- 
Michael Jung
mjung at iss.tu-darmstadt.de